JUSTIFY THE CHOICE OF SOURCED INFORMATION TO BE REFERENCED WITHIN THE ARTICLE
The editors code of practice
IPSO Regulations for the article:
Accuracy: All of the report from Primary and secondary source are accurate and form reliable sources. This means that I don’t have to change anything within the article due to an Accuracy issue.
Privacy: No Privacy Rules were broken. So this means that I don’t have to change anything due to a Privacy issue.
Harassment: None of the Rules against harassment were broken. So this means that I don’t have to change anything due to a harassment issue.
Intrusion into grief or shock: None of the Rules against intrusion into grief or shock were broken. So this means that I don’t have to change anything due to intrusion into grief .
Reporting Suicide: In the original article, I had a report about suicide, but through Sub-Editing I removed this as this type of information wouldn’t be suitable for the target audience. So, now I don’t have to worry about the reporting suicide code.
Children: None of the Rules against rules against children were broken as there were no children int this article. So this means that I don’t have to change anything due to a children issue.
Children in sex cases: There wasn’t any mention of children in sex cases in this article, so it doesn’t need regulating or changing due to this issue.
Hospitals: There wasn’t any mention of hospitals in this article, so it doesn’t need regulating or changing due to this issue.
Reporting of Crime: There wasn’t any mention of Crime in this article, so it doesn’t need regulating or changing due to this issue.
Clandestine devices and subterfuge: There wasn’t any mention of Crime in this article, so it doesn’t need regulating or changing due to this issue.
Victims of sexual assault: There wasn’t any mention of Sexual Assault in this article, so it doesn’t need regulating or changing due to this issue.
Discrimination: There wasn’t any mention of Discrimination in this article, so it doesn’t need regulating or changing due to this issue.
Financial journalism: There wasn’t any mention of Discrimination in this article, so it doesn’t need regulating or changing due to this issue.
Confidential sources: There wasn’t any mention of Confidential sources in this article, so it doesn’t need regulating or changing due to this issue.
Witness payments in criminal trials: There wasn’t any mention of witnesses so this issue in this article, so it doesn’t need regulating or changing due to this issue.
Payment to criminals: There wasn’t any mention of criminals so this issue in this article, so it doesn’t need regulating or changing due to this issue.